She glanced my way, and a shadow of irritation touched her expression.

Ah, yes, there we go.

“Oh right. She’s here.”

I was intruding on her domain, spoiling that.  If I slipped up and pissed her off, I’d be lucky to get hit just once.

A deal’s a deal, but that doesn’t mean there isn’t a chance she’ll go “fuck what Brian said” if sufficiently pissed off.

I knew we were close to our destination when I heard the barking.  Angelica yapped back in reply, cranked herself up to ‘excited frenzy’ mode and rushed forward, pulling on the leash.  Bitch stopped her, directed her to lie down with a motion of her finger, and we waited.  When Angelica relaxed and put her chin on the ground, we moved forward again.

Ah, yes, there’s the leash-pulling. :Å)

We didn’t get three steps before Angelica pulled again, provoking the repetition of orders and another minute long wait.

I think I see what the goal here is. By stopping every time she pulls on the leash, eventually she’ll learn that pulling doesn’t get them to the destination faster.

The third time it happened, Bitch gave me a dark look.  As though it were my fault, or more probable, she might have been anticipating impatience on my part.  I didn’t really mind, though.  It wasn’t like I had anywhere to be, and it was interesting to see her process.

Hehe.

Third, less likely option: “do you see this shit?”

By the way, on the topic of Brian being the scentless man, from the 7.1 asks: While I was looking for the post about Angelica pulling on the leash, I skimmed some of my posts about the scentless man. I found one in particular that showed that I did actually consider the possibility of it being Brian, but I discounted that possibility. For somewhat weak reasons, admittedly.

Bitch led the way as we traced a winding path through the Docks.  Her dogs trotted at her side, occasionally stopping to sniff, but never rushing ahead or lagging so far behind that they pulled on the leash.

Even Angelica is behaving. 🙂

Glancing at her, I could see how she was more at ease, like this.   When she was walking with the dogs at her side, I could see that the lines of her face were softer, there was less tension in her body.  She wasn’t quite so guarded.

Maybe she, to some extent, has managed to forget that Taylor is tagging along. But yes, I think Brutus and the other dogs aren’t the only ones here who enjoy walkies.

I’d sort of assumed that her days of being homeless and fending for herself were the bad days, to her.  That it was a step up, being with us.

They certainly sound bad, to readers who are used to the highly social society we’re part of. Maybe it was different for Rachel, though. Even discounting what her power did to her brain, people are very different, perhaps especially when they’ve grown up under such different conditions.

I was beginning to reconsider whether that was entirely true, seeing her stride down the streets and alleys with her dogs beside her.  Here, she didn’t have to worry about dealing with people and the social maneuverings she could no longer grasp.  This was what she was used to.

Only her and her dogs. :Å)

Buzz 7.2

*bzzt* -ome in, come i– *shsrk* -ixwell calling reade- *crckl* -ead me? I’m b- *skrrch* -me more Wor- *walkiesplode*

Hm, maybe I should consider blogging through Tumblr instead of walkie talkies.

So, last time, we learned a lot about Alec’s past, and then Taylor surprised everyone by negotiating herself into spending some quality time with a less than happy Rachel, which I’m pretty sure is what we’re getting into today. I’m very much looking forward to seeing how these two get along now that Taylor a) isn’t keeping herself at arm’s length and b) understands better how Rachel’s mind works, and they’re in a setting that means a lot to Rachel.

Let’s just jump into it and find out who let the dogs out!

(Hint: It was Rachel.)

This touches on some of the same things as azdoine did in parts of this ask chain, and I think you’re both right. Whether the sexual relationships following are rape or not, the act of using a parapower to (intentionally and without a consenting subject) change someone’s mind permanently, in the first place, should be […]

Yeah, this kind of perspective is exactly why I found myself asking the question of “is this actually rape” in the first place. There is consent, but the victim was forced to become the kind of person who would consent. Where do we draw the line between the legal status of someone who’s had their […]

Okay, so I a) lost track of time and then b) got called upstairs to eat soon after realizing that, so it’s now at the late end of my usual timeframe for starting a session, and I still have a few asks to go through. So I think what I’m going to do is finish off the asks tonight and then liveblog tomorrow instead. Sorry!

And, again: The remaining asks deal with the subject of rape and consent, so if you’re not comfortable with the topic, you may want to sit it out.

I’m going to take a break from asks for a bit, but when I come back, I’m going to be responding to your inputs on the question I raised regarding rape and consent, which I’ve saved for last. If you’re not comfortable with that topic, you may want to sit the remaining asks for this chapter out.